网站地图 | 首页 | 资讯 | 循证 | 会讯 | 下载 | 图库 | 教学 | 动画 | 期刊 | 药品 | 文库 | 学会 | 留言 | 论坛 | 
〒 您现在的位置: 中国动脉粥样硬化网 >> 资讯 >> 药物研究 >> 文章正文 热门图文
阿司匹林与氯吡格雷预防缺血事件比较研究          【字体:
阿司匹林与氯吡格雷预防缺血事件比较研究
作者:CAPRIE S…    文章来源:Lancet 1996 348: 1329–39    点击数:    更新时间:2007-1-18
    Many clinical trials have evaluated the benefit of long-term use of antiplatelet drugs in reducing the risk of       clinical thrombotic events. Aspirin and ticlopidine have been shown to be effective, but both have potentially serious   adverse effects. Clopidogrel, a new thienopyridine derivative similar to ticlopidine, is an inhibitor of platelet        aggregation induced by adenosine diphosphate.

    CAPRIE was a randomised, blinded, international trial designed to assess the relative efficacy of clopidogrel (75 mg once daily) and aspirin (325 mg once daily) in reducing the risk of a composite outcome cluster of ischaemic stroke,     myocardial infarction, or vascular death; their relative safety was also assessed. The population studied comprised      subgroups of patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease manifested as either recent ischaemic stroke, recent         myocardial infarction, or symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. Patients were followed for 1 to 3 years.

    19 185 patients, with more than 6300 in each of the clinical subgroups, were recruited over 3 years, with a mean     follow-up of 1.91 years. There were 1960 first events included in the outcome cluster on which an intention-totreat      analysis showed that patients treated with clopidogrel had an annual 5.32% risk of ischaemic stroke, myocardial          infarction, or vascular death compared with 5.83% with aspirin. These rates reflect a statisticaly significant (p=0.043) relative-risk reduction of 8.7% in favour of clopidogrel (95% CI 0.3–16.5). Corresponding on-treatment analysis yielded a relative-risk reduction of 9.4%. There were no major differences in terms of safety.Reported adverse experiences in the clopidogrel and aspirin groups judged to be severe included rash (0.26% vs 0.10%), diarrhoea (0.23% vs 0.11%), upper     gastrointestinal discomfort (0.97% vs 1.22%), intracranial haemorrhage (0.33% vs 0.47%), and gastrointestinal haemorrhage (0.52% vs 0.72%), respectively. There were ten (0.10%) patients in the clopidogrel group with significant reductions in  neutrophils (<1.2 ×109/L) and 16 (0.17%) in the aspirin group.

    Long-term administration of clopidogrel to patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease is more effective than     aspirin in reducing the combined risk of ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death. The overall safety  profile of clopidogrel is at least as good as that of medium-dose aspirin.
  • 上一篇文章: 普伐他汀与普罗布考联合用药对低胆固醇营养饲养的杂合型WHHL家兔存活和心血管病理学的影响

  • 下一篇文章: 普罗布考对LDL受体缺失小鼠体内LDL氧化和动脉粥样硬化的影响
  • 发表评论】【加入收藏】【告诉好友】【打印此文】【关闭窗口
    热点文章
    · 第九次全国动脉硬化性疾病学术会
    · 抗氧化剂在糖尿病中的有益作用
    · 强化以阿司匹林为基础的抗血小板
    · 抗氧化剂与他汀类药物联合治疗降
    · 单用阿司匹林仍是稳定型心绞痛药
    · 糖尿病动脉粥样硬化炎症和新生血
    · 抗血小板治疗的现在与未来
    · 普罗布考抑制WHHL家兔动脉粥样硬
    · 阿司匹林抑制动脉粥样硬化炎症反
    · 糖尿病、代谢综合征与动脉粥样硬
    推荐文章
    · 第九次全国动脉硬化性疾病学术会
    · IAS中国行长春会议回顾
    · IAS中国行沈阳会议回顾
    · IAS中国行北京会议回顾
    · IAS中国行济南会议回顾
    · 预祝IAS中国行济南会议成功召开!
    · IAS中国行乌鲁木齐会议回顾
    · 预祝IAS中国行乌鲁木齐会议成功召
    · IAS中国行长沙会议回顾
    · IAS中国行天津会议回顾
    相关文章
  • 强化以阿司匹林为基础的抗血

  • 单用阿司匹林仍是稳定型心绞

  • 阿司匹林抑制动脉粥样硬化炎

  • ESC 2006心绞痛指南强调了阿

  • 2006年卒中领域抗血小板治疗

  • 2006 ESC稳定型心绞痛指南抗

  • 阿司匹林对冠状动脉粥样硬化

  • 缺血性脑血管病阿司匹林规范

  • 动脉源性脑缺血后阿司匹林+双

  • 普罗布考选择性增加胆固醇饲

  • 【网友评论】(只显示最新10条。评论内容只代表网友观点,与本站立场无关!)
    | 设为首页 | 加入收藏 | 联系站长 | 友情链接 | 版权申明 | 网站地图 |
    中国病生理学会动脉粥样硬化专业委员会 国际动脉粥样硬化学会中国分会(CAS) 协办
    Copyright © 2003 - 2005 中国动脉粥样硬化网(SINOAS.com) All Rights Reserved